But one of NATO’s great strengths is its power-projection capabilities, something which is only being strengthened by a renewed NATO and increased defense spending amongst its members. NATO was never going to end up bordering China, but NATO power could be extended to defend Taiwan, or other Chinese neighbors, which is the real concern of the Chinese government.
But I like to think this graffiti is just from good guys/gals who are in Kyiv for whatever reason - volunteer work, business, tourism, w/e. Humans being bros.
NATO won’t ever be directly involved against China. It’s strictly there to “keep the peace” in Europe and North America. Several NATO countries, however, might agree to try and contain an expansionist China.
NATO doesn’t mandate involvement; however, let’s not pretend that NATO countries don’t regard each others’ interests as deeply related even when not directly covered by treaty.
A good question. There are a couple of caveats to that:
Most Chinese exports to the US are consumer goods. Especially after the COVID pandemic reinforced the need for strategically self-sufficient vital industries. It would hurt, no doubt, and increase unrest, but it’s not fundamentally crippling to the basic functioning of the economy. It’s toilet paper and household good shortages… again.
Blocking exports to the US would hurt China as well. But more than that, blocking exports to the US would mean the US would pressure everyone we have influence on (ie a good chunk of the world economy) to sanction China in turn, which would be even more painful to their economy. China is the US’s 3rd largest trade partner. The US is China’s largest trade partner.
That would remove almost all incentive for the US NOT to intervene - ie if China is already trying to strangle our economy, how much more can they do, short of nuking us? In other words, Chinese ports would be blocked by USN battlegroups, and that’s a LOT more deadly to the Chinese economy than ‘No trade with China’ is to the US economy. Not only that, but Chinese intervention to Taiwan would undoubtedly be assaulted by US forces in such an event, leaving China both strangled and its offense neutered.
It really is the ideal outcome for China, for Russia to be weakened as much as possible by this war.
A shame about the newfound NATO unity and defense spending.
Yeah, but Russia could act as the buffer between China and NATO, even if it’s in their sphere
But one of NATO’s great strengths is its power-projection capabilities, something which is only being strengthened by a renewed NATO and increased defense spending amongst its members. NATO was never going to end up bordering China, but NATO power could be extended to defend Taiwan, or other Chinese neighbors, which is the real concern of the Chinese government.
But I like to think this graffiti is just from good guys/gals who are in Kyiv for whatever reason - volunteer work, business, tourism, w/e. Humans being bros.
NATO won’t ever be directly involved against China. It’s strictly there to “keep the peace” in Europe and North America. Several NATO countries, however, might agree to try and contain an expansionist China.
NATO doesn’t mandate involvement; however, let’s not pretend that NATO countries don’t regard each others’ interests as deeply related even when not directly covered by treaty.
True!
About the Taiwan thing… Couldn’t China just block exports to the US and cripple its economy to make them leave Taiwan defenceless?
A good question. There are a couple of caveats to that:
Most Chinese exports to the US are consumer goods. Especially after the COVID pandemic reinforced the need for strategically self-sufficient vital industries. It would hurt, no doubt, and increase unrest, but it’s not fundamentally crippling to the basic functioning of the economy. It’s toilet paper and household good shortages… again.
Blocking exports to the US would hurt China as well. But more than that, blocking exports to the US would mean the US would pressure everyone we have influence on (ie a good chunk of the world economy) to sanction China in turn, which would be even more painful to their economy. China is the US’s 3rd largest trade partner. The US is China’s largest trade partner.
That would remove almost all incentive for the US NOT to intervene - ie if China is already trying to strangle our economy, how much more can they do, short of nuking us? In other words, Chinese ports would be blocked by USN battlegroups, and that’s a LOT more deadly to the Chinese economy than ‘No trade with China’ is to the US economy. Not only that, but Chinese intervention to Taiwan would undoubtedly be assaulted by US forces in such an event, leaving China both strangled and its offense neutered.