Richard Stallman had a dream where you control your computing. And XMPP is the closest social network in line with Richard Stallman’s vision of the internet. This instant message protocol, allows for you to easily host your own server, it’s fast and efficient, and has lots of different open source clients to choose from. Additionally, by making it extensible, it allows for anyone to build upon it to get their own desired features. This article goes over some of the basics of XMPP: https://simplifiedprivacy.com/xmpp-decentralized-signal-get-your-own-social-network/

Note: There are no affiliate links or sales text in this educational article discussing open source. Let’s discuss the technology and not attack the author.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think the problem there is that, for many years, nobody bothered to explain to him exactly why child porn is bad.

      Most people observe that everyone else thinks it’s bad and don’t question it any further. That’s not good enough for Stallman, though, and for good reason: expecting him to unquestioningly bow to peer pressure is an insult to his intelligence.

      Someone did eventually explain the problem to Stallman. I don’t know what exactly was explained, but my guess is that Stallman was told that child porn is non-consensual and therefore violates the child’s privacy, similar to how revenge porn violates the subject’s privacy. At any rate, after that discussion took place, Stallman did an about-face on the subject, and is now opposed to child porn like anyone else.

      Moral of the story: taboos and peer pressure bad; logic and education good.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is he a robot? This iseems like a very strange thing to have to explain to a grown-ass man.

        • Dearon@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          Probably just autistic, I mean as far as I know he hasn’t been diagnosed but he’s checking a lot of the boxes. And the way he views the world and basing conclusions on those views make sense to me in that context.

          He’s just more rigid and extreme in approaching the world from that frame of mind than most people are. Thus sometimes leading to “bad” takes where his intentions are probably not terrible in the way people think they are.

        • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          How was he supposed to know, if no one ever told him? They didn’t teach about child porn when I was in school, and Stallman is older than me.

            • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              We are discussing the porn itself, not what happened in the process of making it. If it were illegal to possess a video because it depicts a crime, then it would also be illegal to possess a video of police murdering innocent people, and we definitely don’t want to go there.

              • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                for observers: please don’t essentially argue possession of child sex abuse material should be legal because otherwise the standard is set for making videos of police committing crimes illegal