• Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    So you agree with the idea that submitting a “minor nitpick” PR suggesting that the software doesn’t refer to all users as male is “personal politics” and deserves an angry response for even suggesting it?

    You sure do sound like someone who would agree with Lunduke…

    Being a woman or being transgender isn’t “political”. Vocally opposing inclusiveness is asshole behavior.

    Not even mad that he’s not accepting a low-effort PR. It’s trivializing people’s existence as “political” that makes him shitty.

    • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Making a low effort argument against a straw man that was never stated. You sure you aren’t a conservative?

      No, I disagree with the idea of digging into years of history to drag up the one thing to be mad at and bandwagon over with a loud mob with surface level care that move onto the next bandwagon in a week. Typical to Twitter behavior. Doesn’t actually help anyone, typically hurts the movements they claim to support among everyone else.

      I’m about the farthest from Lunduke you can get, he’s just not wrong in this specific instance. You don’t know me, “you sure do sound” is a silly attempt at internet games. Yawn.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I guess what I’m saying here is that if you agree with Lunduke’s sexist take, you’re just revealing yourself to be a sexist.