• 0 Posts
  • 58 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 4th, 2025

help-circle
  • True, but I got two problems with that thought chain:

    1. I don’t want any outdated dependencies within my network. There might be a critical bug in them and if I back up the images, I keep those bugs with me. That seems pretty silly.
    2. If an application breaks because you updated dependencies, you either have to upgrade the application aswell or got some abandonware on your hands, in which case it’s probably time to find a new one.


  • I’m kinda confused by all of the people here doing that tbh.

    The entire point of dockerfiles is to have them produce the same image over and over again. Meaning, I can take the dockerfile, spin it up on any machine on gods green earth and have it run there in the exact same state as anywhere else, minus eventual configs or files that need to be mounted.

    Now, if I’m worried about an image disappearing from a remote registry, I just download the dockerfile and have it stored locally somewhere. But backuping the entire image seems seriously weird to me and kinda goes against of the spirit of docker.


  • The thing is, this is most certainly the case. I’m willing to bet that every dev uses LLMs every now for certain tasks. Having it find a bug you just can’t find yourself because you’ve been at the problem for like an hour, or have it implement a method that you already know how it should look like so it’s basically just a big autocomplete. I’m also willing to bet that artists will have LLM generate a concept for an asset if they are really out of ideas. It’s like asking friends “hey can you come up with an idea for X” and then you get 15 different inputs, all of them suck ass but there is something that jiggles your inspiration and lets you come up with something.








  • sips tea Ah … come, sit with me for a moment. The tea is hot, and such questions are best answered slowly, with a warm belly.

    It is natural to feel anger when one has been wronged. Even the gentlest river becomes violent when dammed for too long. But we must be careful, my friend, not to mistake the force of our feelings for the wisdom of our actions.

    You ask why one should not kill their oppressors. The answer is not because they are strong, nor because they deserve mercy, nor because the world would punish you. It is because when you choose to do evil in the name of justice, you quietly invite that evil to live inside you. And once it is settled there, it does not leave easily.

    You may believe you are striking only your enemy, but violence has a poor sense of direction. It spills into the soul, changing the person who wields it. The moment you decide that a “good reason” excuses a cruel act, you teach your heart that cruelty can be justified. Soon, it will begin to justify itself.

    Oppression is a heavy chain, but hatred forges a second one, but this time around your own spirit. If you destroy another to feel free, you may discover that freedom never arrived, and only the destruction remained. True victory is not standing over your enemy’s body. True victory is refusing to become what hurt you. It is choosing a path that allows you to look at yourself in the mirror without turning away. The right reasons lose their meaning when they are carried by wrong actions. Like tea made with poisoned water, no matter how fine the leaves, the cup will only bring sickness.

    So no - do not kill your oppressors. Not for their sake, but for yours. Because the most important battle is not against them, but against the part of yourself that believes goodness can be built from blood.





  • realitaetsverlust@piefed.ziptoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldTips
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    To be fair, that isn’t an entirely bad suggestion. I’ve seen so many people who take out loans to travel to like super expensive places. Or people who take one of those borderline scam phone contracts where you get the newest iPhone 213 XLLXQ for “free” but oh wait the phone contract costs 160€/month and 2 year minimum duration. Then you have people who eat out every day, go drink for hundreds of bucks every weekend and so on. You get the drill.

    Some people really are bad with money and thing they can live in a world they clearly can’t afford.






  • And you will have normal people with empathy that get most of the girls.

    I think that isn’t entirely true. Because there isn’t just a manosphere, there is also a “womanosphere” who seems to be hell-bent on exploiting men. Like, there’s a huge amount of clips of woman saying that men that don’t earn enough/are not tall enough/don’t pay everything/etc are useless. This entire situation isn’t only the fault of andrew tate and other wannabe-“alphas” - barely any situation ever is the fault of a single party - but it’s basically “teamwork” between those two really toxic bubbles and all the normal people are basically caught in the crossfire.