• 1 Post
  • 98 Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年7月8日

help-circle






  • Really? Tell that to all the "liberal" regimes that enabled fascists when said liberals couldn't keep working-class revolt in check… Weimar Germany literally did that to crush the "Spartacist" revolt after WW1.

    There's a saying amongst leftists - you can't have a harvest of fascism without liberals loosening the ground for it first. Fascism is not some "aberration" of the classical liberal nation state and it never was.








  • masquenox@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlMurdoch never saw it coming
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 年前

    This whole obsession with policing people’s nationality came about because states were trying to clamp down on the massive amounts of working-class agitation that erupted across the world straight after WW1 - but all that history has essentially been scrubbed out from the “official” narratives.



  • Modern economists don’t normally align themselves with simplistic ideologies

    Yeah… there’s just a whole bunch of them whose sole purpose seems to be coming up with simplistic fairy tale narratives to brainwash the masses with. After all… what would Reagen have been without Hayek, or Pinochet without the Chicago Boys?


  • masquenox@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlEarth-shatering vibrations
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 年前

    Koreas “chaebol” system isn’t just any kind of conglomerattion, though… it was based on the system the Japanese used to dominate Korea during it’s colonization of that country, which the US simply encouraged after the war. The dictatorships that followed basically ran with it… and now you have these gigantic, government-subsidized “chaebols” that is the epitome of “too big too fail.” South Korea is about as oligarchic as it gets.

    It’s utterly hilarious to me when “free market” cultists try to use South Korea as an example of how miraculous their fairy tale economic ideology is.