

I think it’s undeniable that it’s pretty plasticky.
I don’t disagree one that part. In fact, you’d find most Steam Controller fans biggest wish is for a more premium update. That’s been a big wish for a long time with mine being a Steam Controller with better bumpers, gyro with higher polling for high refresh rate gaming, 2 more back buttons, extra bumper buttons like the 8bitdo has, dpad replacing the left joystick, pressure sensitive touchpad that are bit larger, and a much nicer material for the shell.
But, despite the less than premium build quality enthusiasts find the actual functions useful enough to keep using it. Much like the Alpakka controller that doesn’t even have a right joystick or touchpad, but gyro enthusiasts use it because it has the best gyro available right now for controllers.
So basically the stances about build quality and it not being a mainstream device is not something most Steam Controller users disagree with. That’s not really been the point of contention. There’s been agreement on that.



I don’t think their hardware sales becoming insanely profitable is their main goal and their focus on the finance side might be to at the very worst break even.
Their main goal I believe is to try to increase Linux usage so the holdouts against it might start allowing their games to run on Linux, and devs may feel that with Stean machines out there that can run their more resource heavy games better than the Deck it is worth it to pursue proton compatibility.
They probably learned from the mistakes they made in the past when they pushed Linux adoption attempts on to third party companies. They realized they needed to provide some standardized hardware instead of leaving the work to others if they wanted Linux to start being taken more seriously among devs with how small the userbase still is even with the Deck success.