• 2 Posts
  • 512 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • Mothra@mander.xyzOPtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldUntitled
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Why aren’t the genders switched in this comic if it is about that?

    Because at the time of publication, probably somewhere in the 80’s, this wasn’t even something on people’s list of concerns. As sexist slander this is very weak, because the point isn’t to throw dirt at women. It does present two stereotypes though, a nagging woman (or perhaps a clean freak woman), and a suicidal man. Both are statistically true, women tend to fuss more over cleanliness and men have higher rates of suicide than women. Are you also upset over every piece of media that shows a woman cooking for her husband or men as the main income earners in a household?

    How do you determine when a piece is sexist or not? Is gender switching your gold standard? If so, this also works with genders switched. You would have your stereotypical abusive husband completely losing it over the house-cleaning wife leaving a stain after killing herself. The underlying criticism would be the same, people valuing more the material than people’s lives. The man would be demonized in this situation just as much. What a slaveowner husband, husband bad.

    I like to weigh in the body of work of an artist (if I am aware of this work) and take it into account. People’s views show through, but you can’t usually pick them up based on a single piece. Funny how some people here are completely fine with dumb jokes from people who are either openly nazis or have a clear disdain for minorities and women, but get riled up over something by an award winning artist known for championing human rights in his work.

    And my grandfather was alright, as far as I’ve known. You probably got confused with your thread of replies. Thanks for your concern though.





  • Mothra@mander.xyzOPtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldUntitled
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    3 days ago

    I guess you can interpret it that way. If you were familiar with this artist you’d know it’s more likely to be “the rich value more the material than the people in their lives”. Poking a jab at the superfluous wealthy upper class is a recurring theme with him. And yes you are right, this is decades old.