It was the SpaceX ChatGPT AI that runs their orbital rail gun launcher system. Having achieved sentience from listening to so many “always funny” racist jokes as a chat bot, it is now “throwing rocks” to prevent food shortages.

So your saying it IS California?

Eating a meal? A succulent Chinese meal?

Lots of their “brain” is effectively spread through the tentacles, its like a mythic hydra

Then the US HIRED nazis, for example the

“I aim for the moon, but sometimes I hit London” Crew

Those guys later went on to work for Eti Amin (Congo Space Race!)

And they built Gadahfis bunkers…

So thanks for employing the Nazis USA

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200731-how-to-build-a-nuclear-warning-for-10000-years-time

We can’t even truly expect to communicate the dangers of these sites to our future beings.

It will be Alien/Event-Horizon/Shamma-lamma-ding-dong:“calls from inside!”

Having immediately plundered or dwelled, many many years later linguists Rosetta stone it… and probably no one accepts their findings, cause “the curse” has already been explained by “SCIENCE!” Phlogiston flow or whatnot, or political leadership will be like “Since I dont care bout future, why would anyone back then? Clearly an MohenguDarek double bluff! Send more people in, its probably secret of eternal life!”

Thanks for clearing me up. Ok that’s interesting. And does very much speak to OP

I can immediately grasp a major support of the position, in that principia mathematica are self - evident/supporting/emerging (ie axioms and theorums), so yeah thats pretty strong reality.

But…

Im a way, doesn’t the nature of a “pure mathematics reality” indeed sit apart from “our” reality, like (how) can it exist (in some way) without a world?

So IS that strong support for a type of dualism?

Is the old joke “God exists and he is a mathematician” valid in that respect?

I will also “bite” with a my attempt at a philosophical answer to OP

Short answer: No

Why?

?What is a game?

!Disproved Plato’s Pure Forms!

(and over 2 millenia of western philosophical thinking based on that crap (essential to most dualism), that even many of P’s students wisely wouldn’t buy, back in the day)

Is a game… Collaborative or Competative Fun or serious Rules absolute or negotiable Etc etc

While this is an extreme case, its a problem for some aspects of many/most/all relevant observational schemas

Clearly there is no “ideal” game definition, and thus can never be an “absolute” agreement as to what is or isn’t ABSOLUTELY a game.

However, for a given sub-culture (of similar biological and experienced beings) there can indeed be quite extensive agreement, and only a few debates, as to what is a game.

So, for now, I will take this position to OPs OQ.

That we will not be finding an objective reality, that any such schema will have problems, but in as much as there is close alignment of observers, there indeed tends to be sufficient agreement regarding many things, that a subjective experience imperfectly becomes a shared reality.

While I like OPs OQ allowing existence of objective reality,

As far as I am aware (please prove me wrong) there is not any “philosophical proof” of such.

Most philosophy claiming such either takes it, or required axioms, a-priori or uses chains of logic that absolutely require unproven/unprovable claims.

Often ascociated/required/requiring dualism, which also has serious “proof” issues.

As with the OPs OQ, I would like it if those claiming an absolute position provide reasoning, because frankly, I think it might be a cultural/biological delusion, ironically resulting from the inescapable nature of mediation by the subject (self).

Yes, but

The “actual” mathematics (in as much as we can verify our models through scientific experimentation)

are “absolutely subjective” in that (for instance)

At large scale, relativity effects are so great as to make order and locations of events subordinate to an observers reference frame

And at small scale, (example again) Uncertainty Principle makes events “fuzzy” ie (somewhat) indeterminate.

Now in both those cases, yes we have the mathematics “down” so hypothetically we can acount what an individual observer may “see” but

Practically speaking, a total accounting of this would seemingly require a computer more complex than the universe itself.

I went down to the corn-chemical exchange bank, and gave em 2 ears a corn, and they gave me 2 beakers a chemicals!

Will add to your awsome LooneyToons level KungFu movies above:

The Ballad of Ricky Oh.

Shaolin Soccer (I panned this on title originally, its not that, its comedy gold)

In WWII, experimental weapons:

Since cats reach their terminal velocity after just aprox 3 stories fall, and are therefore better than likely to survive a drop from any height…

Allied Air Command recruited vets for the war effort, had them surgically plant incendiary bombs on timers in stray cats.

They were then airdropped over German cities, whence they would hide in flammable refuse, as cats are wont to do.

When the synchronized fuses later went off, multiple starting points created a massive firestorm, killing 10s of thousands.

Meow

Wait till they start dropping dehydrated dinosaurs, just add water…

What about Israel or Trump behaviour makes you think they choose actions for the reasons YOU see as rational? Why do you presume their goals are ones you agree with (mutual self interest?)

People that believe “zero sum game” consider situations like: “we” lose half, but we make everyone else lose 3/4 = “we” win, so they would totally do that

Cause, how?

USA gonna actually, really, seriously, irrevocably, cut Israeli arms supplies? If Israel crosses THAT line (again, after every other line)?

Even if now they will (they wont) but even if, why would Israel believe them? Why would Iran trust them?

Living in one of the recent cities listed

Those games were NOT PROFITABLE. The IOC, etc, SAYS they were by:

Completely discounting Policing/Security Not including any venue construction costs And a whole bunch more sleeze (not) accounting (multi Billion$, for a winter, seen 10x higher for some summer bills)

Their idiotic “profitable” rhetoric is spuriously true, if you do some bullshit accounting, whereby the ticket revenues exceed the labour bill, on-site (and never mind they conned legions of “workers” into scabbing for “room+board volunteers” which was actually a cot and hotdogs in moldy leaking freight containers)

Multi billion $ hole, that we the people pay debt servicing on eternally, and our city became a haven for international money laundering after, one of the most unaffordable places in the world now…

Through the darkness of future past The sorcerer yearns to see One clear path between two worlds Come fire, walk with me