• stardust@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 months ago

    Never really understood why companies like Twitter can have thousands of employees for what the product is.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Redundant, like the server staff who told Elon it would take 6 months to move the servers… so he decided to move them himself on a whim… and it took 6 months to finish making them operational again?

      Or redundant like the content moderation staff, whose redundancy has turned X into an even bigger dumpster fire?

      Moderating and serving the content from 300 million users, worldwide, in near real time and no downtime, might seem like a simple task, but it really is not.

      • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Leaked twitter moderation steps.

        If racist, then allow

        If woke, then bully and shadow ban

    • Blake (he/him) @beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      To be fair, Twitter needs very good infrastructure to be usable (e.g. caching) and obviously content moderation is as robust as their investment in it (those could be contract workers though)

        • Blake (he/him) @beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh, sure, I didn’t mean to compare the two really. Just pointing out that although Twitter is simple and easy to replicate in concept, trying to scale to support all humans as users (theoretically) is difficult

    • Rolivers@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      They don’t tbh. I think many jobs there are redundant but people play an elaborate game to pretend it isn’t.

      • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        facepalm I truly mixed that in my brain. But Valve also has this Dota Chess Game, right? Not sure if you would count that as a success though, have totally lost track of it.

        • astrionic@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          You’re thinking of Dota Underlords, which was popular for a short time but then quickly got abandoned. I definitely wouldn’t count it as a success.

        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’ve not played Half Life Alyx but people seemed to like it. And let’s not forget the huge success of the Steam Deck!

  • Kissaki@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    as of 2021, Valve employed just 79 people for Steam, which is one of the most influential gaming storefronts on the planet.

    There’s value in stability, but some things have long been stagnant and could be improved. It took a long time for the client and website to get some significant changes.

    I don’t know if I would prefer more changes. I certainly would like and want some. But that could inevitably lead to undesirable changes too.

    When I applied for a job there over a decade ago [to improve some stuff myself] I didn’t receive an answer. bee laugh emoji